Ukraine’s Apocalyptic Plan to Cutoff Crimea and Bring NATO into the War Exposed

In my previous letters, I warned that Ukraine knows its only option to defeat Russia is to create the conditions that ensure NATO enters the war. At the time, I offered possible scenarios on how this may occur, but wasn’t clear about which option(s) Ukraine would choose. However, in the last 48 hours, there have been disturbing developments, which I believe support one of the “unthinkable” options is becoming increasing likely. That option is to destroy Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, create a radiological disaster, and blame Russia. As insane as that “should” sound to anyone with a conscience, you need to look at the game board through the eyes of a corned psychopathic rat like Zelensky. If this scenario plays out, the consequences will be unimaginable and will trigger a chain of events that most likely will lead to the death of most of the inhabitants of Europe and North America. I hope I have your attention and have convinced you to read on, because your life depends on it.

I really do try to avoid the fear porn, but I have had nothing but apocalyptic news of late. I really would love to be able to spin a rosier picture, but it would be unethical because it would create a false sense of security. There is a very real confluence of dire situations I now see combining to potentially trigger a world altering escalation in the war. We truly are in the most dangerous times ever and the world is asleep at the wheel. If it is just me laying on my horn, so be it. At least I tried to warn you. With that, let’s look at the case.

First, ask yourself this. Would Ukraine destroy critical infrastructure despite the massive ecological disaster and even deaths it would cause and then blame Russia? I guess your answer depends on how naive and gullible you are. If you believe Russia is a habitual arsonist that loves blowing up its own infrastructure like undersea pipelines and dams to its own detriment, then no. However, if you possess some degree of basic common sense and independent logic, you’d have to conclude that the Ukraine has habitually staged false flags when it comes to infrastructure sabotage. Would Ukraine then go so far as destroying a nuclear reactor? I would say absolutely. Let’s be honest, it’s not like Ukraine is unfamiliar with nuclear disasters and they didn’t have any problem causing a dam break that annihilated a huge area down stream with zero regard for the people, pets, livestock, and homes the flood annihilated. If they think there is a benefit, even a small one at this point, they’ll go for it.

Next, let’s consider motive. For Ukraine to want to destroy the nuclear power plant they would need to garner some benefit. With respect to the dam, Ukraine demonstrated that it was willing to incur damage just as long as it hurt the Russians more. This precedent is ominous because Russia and the territories it claims in eastern Ukraine would incur by far the worst damage of the nuclear disaster. This calculus comes down to basic meteorology and the direction of the prevailing winds. The wind blows towards Russia, not Ukraine. This means the cloud of radiological fallout would blow right into Russia. Sure, Ukraine and surrounding areas would be affected, but nothing nearly as bad as Russia. This alone makes an attack something Ukraine would consider, but alone may not be enough to justify the act. So, is there something more? Yes, in fact there is. Ukraine has been desperately trying to breech Russian defensive lines in what, to date, has been a disastrous attempt to cut through to Mariupol and Melitopol. The Ukrainian goal of these thrusts is to severe Russia’s direct access by land to Crimea. This area has proven to be almost impenetrable and Ukraine has lost thousands of men in the trenches, minefields, and artillery kill boxes trying. However, much like blowing the dam and washing away Russia’s prepared network of defenses, why not just release a radiological cloud to force the evacuation of this exact area. By consulting a map, one can quickly see how the fallout pattern would create exactly the conditions Ukraine is seeking and failing to achieve by force of arms. Now step back and look at the bigger picture. Russian access would be cut to Crimea from the north due to the fallout while their defenses to the south were cleared by the flood, which is now receding and drying up making it something the Ukrainians can again cross. Russia’s remaining route to Crimea would be across the Kerch bridge, which is vulnerable and almost certainly will be destroyed as part of the operation. On top of that, Russia would be forced to deal unilaterally with a nuclear disaster of unprecedented scale eating up an immense amount of men and materials that would otherwise be dedicated to the fight. This would leave Crimea either uninhabitable or more likely, undefendable by Russia. If you aren’t seeing the military value of destroying the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant for Ukraine by this point, you are blind.

With a motive established, one would need to prove a capability to carry out such an attack to make it a viable option. In this regard, I do not think it is hard to conclusively say Ukraine has numerous capabilities that could effectively hit and destroy the power plant. Ukraine could employ any number of weapons systems such as Storm Shadow missiles, heavy glide bombs, HIMARs missiles, sabotage, and/or artillery, rocket, and other forms of indirect fire or missile attacks to destroy the nuclear power station. What isn’t so obvious is what form that attack would need to take to remain, at minimum, clandestine so that Russia could be falsely blamed. Looking back to the destruction of the dam, it is fair to say someone pulled it off without attribution so we know it is doable even if we don’t know exactly who or how. In addition, Ukraine has all of the Western media doing its bidding so it won’t have any trouble painting a propaganda narrative with no questions asked. This is ultimately where it would count so even if it opted for an overt missile and/or bomb attack, it could count on the media to carry water for its lies.

Since we have identified a solid motive for destroying the nuclear power plant and that Ukraine possesses more than enough capability to execute that plan, we need now only to identify a trigger. In this regard, I offer to you desperation as the spark necessary to detonate this scenario. Under optimum circumstances it’s fair to assume that neither Russia nor Ukraine would destroy the plant. However, if faced with an existential threat...say an imminent defeat, which could be averted by destroying the nuclear power plant, Russia might, but Ukraine definitely would destroy it. I say might and definitely because Russia simply has more options and would be less likely to see the cost-benefit justify the act. However, for Ukraine, they are out of options and most of the worst collateral damage would affect Russia so they’d have every incentive to destroy it. Ukraine is fast running out of men and weapons. It is desperate and is losing. Despite the massive propaganda and lies, Ukraine knows that it cannot beat Russia. The only...only...chance it has to prevail, is to draw the rest of the world into the war. It can do this by staging a false flag attack on the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. The worst case for Ukraine is it gets caught and NATO doesn’t enter the war. However, a successful attack would cut Russia off from Crimea and deny Russia the lands it invaded so it is a risk worth taking. If Crimea is not covered in fallout, Ukraine would still have a direct route to attack and cutoff Russian forces before moving on to retake Crimea. However, the best case for Ukraine is that the nuclear disaster is severe enough to trigger Article 5 and NATO enters the war just as Russia trying to evacuate the very same area where just days before it was dug in and prepared for battle. As such, we have established precedent, motive, capability, and a trigger for Ukraine to attack the nuclear power plant. Now it is time to look at debunking counter arguments and address any additional evidence before making a conclusive call on the attack.

There is at least one major argument that needs to be debunked if Ukraine can be expected to attack this plant. That argument focuses on the Russian response and if it would be severe enough to dissuade Ukraine from carrying out the attack. Russia does have a vote so I’d agree their predicted response would be the only moderator on a Ukrainian decision to attack the plant. If Ukraine believed Russia would launch a nuclear retaliation for this, I’d agree that they’d likely opt to not attack the plant. However, even as horrendous as destroying the nuclear power plant would be, it alone probably wouldn’t trigger more than heavy escalation and full-scale Russian mobilization. Instead, the odds are much higher that this only injures Russia and forces NATO to enter the war. After NATO enters, Ukraine isn’t as concerned about being nuked because Russia then will have bigger fish to fry with all of NATO to contend with. Further, it knows that even if the war did go nuclear at that point, and it likely would, Russia will be firing missiles at NATO targets, not Ukrainian ones. Ukraine knows its proximity to Russia actually gives it some protection from Russian use of nuclear weapons primarily because of the same reasons destroying the power plant makes sense from its perspective. That is because the fallout from any strike in Ukraine will blow directly back to Russia and Russia would naturally try to avoid this. Russia will have to deal with NATO’s nuclear arsenal, not Ukraine’s more-or-less defeated military. As sick and diabolical is this may be, from the calculus of an evil selfish man like Zelensky, this is his play to survive. Therefore, even the potential risk of a Russian nuclear retaliation does not counter balance the cost-benefit calculus in favor of launching an attack.

The last piece I want to consider is if there is other evidence to support Ukraine is at least thinking about such an attack. Here again, I find a disturbing trend. Just like in advance of the dam being destroyed, Ukraine has been conducting a media blitz of predictive programming falsely claiming Russia is planning to destroy it. See: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ukraine-spy-chief-accuses-russia-of-mining-cooling-pond-at-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-plant/ar-AA1cOblZ This proves that Ukrainians are indeed considering this possibility. It demonstrates Ukraine has a guilty conscience. Of course, just like with the dam, no explanation or rationale is given to justify why Russia would destroy its own critical infrastructure to its detriment and Ukraine’s benefit, but such is the way of propaganda. In fact, the Ukrainians provide some very specific information, which is verifiably false. Specifically, Ukrainian leadership claim Russia has mined the cooling pond. However, none other than the IAEA says that it is a false claim. The IAEA isn’t infallible, but they are far more trustworthy than say a Ukrainian spy chief and Zelensky. See: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/iaea-no-mines-observed-near-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-plant-s-cooling-pond/ar-AA1cTG5P If they lied about this point, they lied about everything and cannot be trusted. The only purpose to lie about that is to create a pretext to blame Russia for when they blow it up. They want to just say, “See, see, we told you Russia mined it.” Thanks to the IAEA though, we know now if something there does blow up, it wasn’t from any mines Russia planted. Again, we know Ukraine is lying to front run the narrative for the attack it is about to carry out and this just proves it. The world elites believe we won’t think beyond the headlines and buy their lies and deception. Well, we don’t and I have news for them that isn’t propaganda. For those world leaders that think they can start World War III and sneak away unscathed, you are both foolish and wrong. This war will find you first and won’t discriminate based on class or title, or the size of your bank account. This war, if allowed to escalate beyond Ukraine, will visit us all and life as we know it will cease forever.

So here is my conclusion based on a logical assessment of the evidence. Ukraine is going to attack the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in the very near future. If not stopped, it is going to cause a massive ecological disaster and will be used by NATO to trigger Article 5 and enter the war. Russia will be forced to deal with a massive radiological disaster and will have to evacuate its troops back from the line of contact leaving its forces to the south in Crimea isolated. Ukraine will also destroy the Kerch bridge to completely cut off Russian forces in Crimea by land. At that point, the remaining 5 uncommitted brigades Ukraine has held in reserve will poor across the Dnipro River, probably somewhere north of Kherson and sprint towards key objectives in Crimea. Zelensky said they were going to retake Crimea, but he didn’t say this will lead to WWIII and most likely the end of life as we know it so he can pocket some cash at the world’s expense. Now you know his play.

Recommendation: Folks, about the only play we have now is to get this out there in front of as many people as possible. This needs to get in front of every talk show host, reporter, world leader, and pundit you can find. If...if, we can let people know what Ukraine is planning, we may be able to force them to scrap their plan and avert WWIII at least for a bit longer. This isn’t a time for apathy and returning to your comfortable normalcy bias. This is very real and as dangerous as it could possibly get. You have to take action now and yes, that means you because I don’t have enough subscribers to remotely hope to think someone else will pick up the slack! I hope there is a next time...